Radiant Comics

As a comic book reader I’m always thinking to myself “I should sit down and reread those comics.” But then there never seems to be the time. After all I go to the comic book store every week and buy new comics. I read five or six new comics a week and usually I read them twice. Once the week I get them and then a second time the following week. That’s my habit. I like reading a few different comics in one sitting. Maybe a new issue of The Savage Dragon, then a Lazarus, and after that a Usage Yojimbo. I find the variety fun.

I don’t usually buy back issues but I do occasionally buy collected editions of old comics. I have Marvel Masterworks collections of some of my favorite old comics like Starlin’s Warlock, Perez’s Avengers, and Ditko’s Spider-Man. I don’t always get to reading those right away and they can sit around for months waiting for me to get to them. I don’t know why except that I usually read my comics as periodicals rather than novels. Yet I’m always wanting to read them as novels too.

Some people only like to read their comics as novels in collected editions. They often say they hate waiting between issues and like to read a big chunk of something. I find this explanation lacking because the single issues come out first and there is even more waiting if you’re only reading collected editions. You could buy the single issue, let them stack up, and then read a big chunk with less waiting than reading just collected editions. I think what they really mean is that they prefer the convenience of having a lot of issues in one one volume. There is less to keep track of. That makes more sense to me.

I like reading my comics in the monthly format because I enjoy their periodical nature. The wait between issues is part of the enjoyment. A cliffhanger isn’t effective when you can just turn the page of a collected edition and see the resolution. When you have to wait a month is when a cliffhanger works. There is time to talk about and contemplate the comic. Time adds to the story experience.

Another thing I like about single issues is the covers. Comic book covers are an art all to themselves and they are best seen on the actual comics. They usually print the covers in the collected editions but as inside pages they have less impact. Often the inside edge of the cover is eaten up by the binding and that makes it harder to see and ruins the composition. I especially like flipping through old comic book series to look at the covers. It’s like a little time machine. You can watch the months go past as you flip from cover to cover. You can’t get that from a collected edition.

Whenever I actually do reread comics it’s a conscious decision to change my habits for a little while. When I take a break from doing work I sit down and play a video game or surf the web for fifteen minutes or so. Instead of doing that I have to choose to sit down and read some comics. I really have to do it consciously. Reading a pile of thirty or forty comics can seem like a large task compared to video games or web surfing which takes no effort at all. Reading those comics is really a pleasure and not a task but my brain doesn’t always think so until I start. Often after I start I have to tear myself away from the comics and get back to work.

I actually got around to rereading some comics in the last couple of weeks. The first is a Crossgen comic called “Scion.” I’m a little nostalgic for Crossgen comics. There is a sort of lost world aspect of them for me. They were here and then gone. Crossgen was around from about 2001 until about 2005 and they made a lot of good comics. I have fond memories of them. Crossgen is probably the first company to get digital coloring right. It was better than Marvel and DC’s digital coloring at the time. “Scion” ran for 41 issues that were mostly written by Ron Marz and drawn by Jim Cheung. I reread all 41 issues.

Overall I give the series a grade of B. It wasn’t my favorite Crossgen series but it was solid. The Jim Cheung art gets an A though. One of the reasons the series isn’t higher with me is that it’s about royal families. That’s a subject matter that I happen to dislike so if you don’t have that prejudice you might like it better. It’s about to kingdoms that are going to war with each other and the lead character is a prince of one of the kingdoms. It’s kind of a mash-up of sword and sorcery and sci-fi adventure. There are princes that hate each other, family power struggles, a little Romeo and Juliette action, betrayal, bounty hunters, and big battles. It’s worth a read if you never have.

The second group of comics that I reread is Terry Moore’s “Echo” issues 1-30. This came out from 2008-2011 and I’ve meant to read them as a group ever since then. It’s only taken seven years but I’ve finally done it.

“Echo” is a character based sci-fi story about a woman who witnesses a woman in a hi-tech flying suit of metal being shot down by missiles only to have the suit attach itself in part to her. Now she’s being pursued by an arms company that wants to keep her quite and get their weapon back.

I say it’s a character based story because in any Terry Moore story the interaction between the characters is generally as important if not more so than the plot. It takes place in the Terry-verse as some of the characters from his long running “Strangers in Paradise” comic show up. A couple of Parker Girls make an appearance.

I’ve never been disappointed by a Terry Moore comics and this is no exception. It’s an excellent series. Terry Moore’s art and storytelling are always on point. He especially good at drawing pretty women and great hair. Reading it from month to month there were some issues where things moved very quickly and it left me wanting more but reading it all at once I had the more at my disposal. I still remembered the feeling though.

That’s one of the reasons I like reading comics monthly. I can experience them as periodicals with time to reflect between the issues and as a graphic novel. Reading them just in their collected form takes one of those experiences away from me. I like them both. I just have to make the time for that second one.

I have a lot of working drawings done on a specific odd sized paper. What is a working drawing you ask? A working drawing is any drawing that an artist makes in support of a finished piece of art. The drawing itself isn’t a finished piece of art but it helps the artist to get to the finished piece. So in my process I start with a small sketch (usually an ink sketch these days), blow that up and print it out in blue line on a new piece of paper, and then make a drawing right over the blue line sketch. That new pencil drawing is a working drawing. I then take that drawing and turn it into a painting or a print. It’s one of those two that’s the finished artwork.

The paper a lot of my older working sketches are drawn on is a 5.5×11.5 inch piece of Bristol board. It’s a tall and thin proportion that isn’t found in any precut sketchbook or art paper. It’s an odd size because it’s a piece of leftover scrap paper.

Back in 1989, when I first started working in the Marvel Comics offices in the production bullpen, I learned that Marvel handed out the paper the comic books were drawn on to the artists. This was for two reasons. One was because the artwork had to be first drawn in pencil and then drawn in ink over the pencils. Usually this job was handled by two different people. Those two people had two different preferences in paper. Often the penciller liked paper with a tooth to it while inkers liked paper that was smooth. Picking a paper that was a compromise between those two preferences was important in order to get the best work out of both the penciller and the inker.

The second, and possibly more important reason, was to insure the art was done at the correct size and to the correct proportions. I’ve noticed over the years that some artists aren’t that good at making things the correct size. It’s a blind spot to certain artists. They just don’t think of it no matter how much you remind them. They’re thinking of the drawing and not the page size. It’s only, maybe, one in six artists but they sure will gum up the system. Pages that come in at the wrong size will take up three times as much of the production person’s time a correctly size page will. No one needs that.

So Marvel had their own paper made to size and printed with non-photo blue guidelines on it. Non-photo means that the lines are a light enough blue that the blue lines won’t show up in a photocopy or photostat. Anything lighter than a 50% grey will drop out in a photocopy. So the artist got an 11×17 inch piece of paper (two-ply Bristol board) with blue guidelines on it that indicated the 10×15 inch are to be drawn in. DC and other comic book companies did the same thing.

The pieces of paper that I, and plenty of others, have drawn on are leftovers from that process. I remember being told that Strathmore, who made the paper, cut three 11×17 inch sheets out of a larger sheet of paper and this 5.5×11.5 inch piece of paper was the leftover. That means the original sheet of paper had to be about 22×28 inches. I think that’s a standard size for a sheet of art paper. It also means that the 11×17 inch paper was probably slightly small than that. Otherwise the scrap paper wouldn’t have those extra half inches. Or maybe the original sheet was a half inch bigger than I think.

When Strathmore used to ship Marvel a new batch of paper for the Marvel artists they would include the scrap pieces. After all, Marvel paid for them and Strathmore had no use for them. So they put them in boxes and sent them out. They used to be all around the office for anyone to use. It was really good paper so why not draw on it? Almost every artist who either worked in the office or stopped by the office had some of it. That paper was a familiar sight in the 1990s world of comics and if you saw some that size you knew exactly where it came from.

I brought a ton of it home over the years but I should have grabbed even more. I think it was around the late 1990s when it started to disappear from the Marvel offices. I don’t know why it disappeared since Marvel was still getting paper made for the artists but I suspect it had to do with Marvel’s new owner. He was the world’s cheapest man and lots of things started to disappear from around the office in those days. He didn’t even want comic books in the office. Yes, he owned Marvel Comics and didn’t think there should be comics in the office. He was also a micromanager when it came to stuff like that so I can easily see him telling Strathmore to stop sending the scrap paper. I have no idea if that’s true or not but either way there was no more scrap paper to be found.

I still had plenty of it at home though. Probably about five hundred to eight hundred sheets. That doesn’t sound like a lot but after I left Marvel in the summer of 2005 the paper didn’t run out until a few years later. It’s not like I used it for everything. Just some small working drawings. I was a bit sad when it finally ran out. Not only because I now had to buy paper to suit the purpose that those 5.5×11.5 sheets served so well but because it was the end of an era. To me the last vestige of the 1990s comic book boom was those sheets of paper.

I occasionally speak with some of the people who were around in that era and they tell me that they still have some sheets of that Bristol board lying around. I’m pretty sure some of them have even chucked a bunch of it out over the years. Either way that paper can make us old timers a bit nostalgic. Isn’t that a strange thing. Nostalgia over an odd paper size.

Incidentally the paper I use now instead of the Marvel scrap paper comes from a 9×12 inch pad of Bristol board. I cut the paper in half and draw on 6×9 inch sheets. It’s actually a better size and proportion but it doesn’t have the same emotional pull. Such is life.

Stuff piles up. That’s the way life is. Things get cluttered here in my studio and that means I have to inject some order into the chaos. It always happens. I make new stuff and it has to go somewhere. It usually hangs around for months at first but then it all gets to be too much. I’m nearing that point now and have to put things in order.

Just last week I spent half a day putting other stuff in order so it’s a bit of a surprise to me that I have to do it again so soon. This is more of a surface ordering and last week was a deep ordering. I actually had to rearrange shelves to put stuff away last week.

It was all the comic book sized drawings and sketch covers that I put in order last week. I’ve done a lot of them over the last few years and they were all in different places. Some were in a comic book box, others laying flat on a shelf, and still more were on top of a desk in a flat file. If I needed to find a particular one I had to look through a lot of them. So I wanted to put them all in one place.

I decided to put them all on a shelf. Of course that meant removing the stuff that was already on the shelf. I searched for the comics that I looked at the least, took them off the shelf, put them in a box, and rearranged the rest of the shelves until I had one big area free. Now I had a place to put my comic book sized drawings.

This whole process took longer than I though it would. Isn’t that always the way? I had to put all the drawings in order, sketch covers, monster covers, monsters on comics, fashionista zombies, and faux comic book covers. I made dividers and labels for about two dozen different categories. It was worth it. Now I can find things. They take up about two feet worth of shelf space so that’s a lot of stuff.

Now I have my regular chaotic build up to deal with. I have a few spots in my studio that artwork piles up on. First is my easel. When I draw or paint on it I clear everything off of it to work. Otherwise I pile work up on it to look at. I have my large 24×36 inch drawing board on it right now and usually there are some 11×17 inch drawings displayed on there too. I put the drawings up there so I can examine at them and determine if they are finished or not. If they’re finished I’ll leave them up there to have something to look at. So I can end up with a thick pile of drawings stacked up there.

In the last month I made some 8×10 inch drawings on canvas. They’re stacked up on the easel right now and all there have a three quarters of an inch thickness. They take up a lot of room so I had to move most of my other drawings off my easel to see them. This meant a half inch stack of drawings had to go somewhere.

I have a couple of temporary places to put drawings. I have two scanners. One is 11×17 inches and one is 8.5×11 inches. It’s on top of those that I tend to pile things. The smaller scanner gets used less so things get piled on top of it more. But recently I had to use it so I had to take some stuff off of it and put the stuff away. Not all of the stuff got put away though. A lot of it got moved on top of the bigger scanner.

I also have a table in the corner of the studio that my art supplies are piled on. Stuff I don’t use all the time but use often enough that it sits out. If supplies are handy they’ll get used more. I also have an 8.5×11 inch box on that table that drawings get piled in. And then there is my actual drawing table. It’s around 30×40 inches and smaller drawings pile up around the edges. My 5.5×8.5 inch sketchbook sits on it most of the time and it can also accumulate a lot of 6×9 inch drawings plus various art cards.

So now I’m surrounded by four areas of clutter. I’ve seen it a lot worse but sometimes my mind feels cluttered and organizing my work space can help uncluttered my thoughts. To my left, on my big scanner, are mostly my 11×17 inch faux comic book cover drawings in various states of finish. Some are inked and some are colored. The colored ones are finished and need to be put away but that means rearranging even more stuff.

To my right is the box on my table and that’s mostly easy. It’s comic book size drawing that can go in my newly arranged shelf space. The easel I’m unsure of as it all my latest stuff. They might have to stick around. My desk has stuff on it that I need to scan in and put away so that will take some time. But it’s been worse. I think I’ve almost got a handle on it all.

What I don’t have a handle on, and what drives me crazy about organizing, is forgetting where I put something. Last week when I organized my comic size art shelf I also organized some of my 8.5×11 inch photos. They’re a little too big for the shelf so I found them their own spot. When I found some more photos that size I went to put them away with the rest and discovered I couldn’t remember where their spot was. That have to be here somewhere but I have no idea where. I looked for half an hour and could find them. I know where my 11×17 inch photos are. I know where my 5×7 inch photos are. But I have no idea where the new spot for my 8.5×11 inch photos is. How crazy is that? I organized them right out of existence.

Tinged with nostalgia. That’s what the glasses I’m looking through are. I say that because I decided to pull out some old artwork to write about and I picked some painted comic book pages that I made sometime in the mid 1990s. I really wish I had dated stuff back then but I didn’t. These pages are from when I was first learning to paint with gouache and I decided to paint a short ten page comic story. I figured that was the best way to do a lot of painting at different sizes and get a good learning experience. Looking back at the pages they are solidly mediocre but I can see the beginnings of how I later painted with gouache in a much better way.

I pulled out just two of the pages to look at because that’s all I need at the moment to give them a good examination. Each page is thirteen by nineteen inches and the first has five panels on it and the second six. That’s eleven small paintings. That’s a lot of painting.

The first page has the general style of the whole piece. There is an illustrative realism to it. I think I photo referenced a lot of the figures in the story so they came out a lot more life-like than if I tried to make them up out of my head. I think the first panel is pretty good. A close-up on a face and hand. I worked best with this technique at a larger scale. Every artist has a scale and mine tends to be large rather than small. The hand is a little thick and clunky and the hair lacks technique but I like the mouth and teeth. Still, I was never that good at realism. It doesn’t suit me. I like the geometry of the objects in the background better than the face in the foreground. I could have really made something out of that poster behind him.

Page one panel two is adequate at best. I like some of the shadows on the floor but the foreshortening on the arm and hand do not thrill me. I almost pulled off the rest of the figure but didn’t get any good shadows to root him to the spot. It’s not like he and the bed are floating but they almost are.

Panel three might be the second best panel on the page. The guy is painted okay and this time I almost pulled off a good hair technique. Illustrative painting is all about technique and I didn’t know enough of them. Of course that’s why I was doing this story. To learn. I like the hand this time and the watercolor marks behind the figure. The coat he has his hand on is only meh. Over all it’s the middle of the road.

Panel five is a complete failure. I did not get enough form in the coat he’s putting on. This one makes me wince.

Panel six is not terribly interesting. I can tell I put a bit of work into it but in the end it’s just a door on a screened in porch. The screen technique is almost there but not quite. I barely even noticed the car driving away in the background.

I was actually surprised when I flipped the page and saw the second page of these two. I can’t tell you the last time I looked at these pages but I bet it was twenty years ago. I don’t remember much of the story and it hasn’t sat well in my memory. I mostly remember it as a learning experience and not something to be proud of and show off. So it surprised me when I saw this bright green, red, and blue page.

The first two panels are more typical of the story. The close-up on the face is well done this time. I like the way it’s cropped and I think the sun glasses add some visual interest to it. Panel two is a solid little landscape. It isn’t spectacular but it’ll do.

It was panels three through six that surprised me and made me feel nostalgic. It looks like a flashback dream sequence (I’m not even sure since I can’t bring myself to read all the pages right now) so I moved it into the realm of the weird. As it turned out later in my artistic life the realm of the weird is where I excel.

In panel three the black shovel is particularly powerful. There are black borders throughout the pages but otherwise I wasn’t using much black at all. It was all color paint. So the sudden intrusion of a black silhouette is startling. The black shovel continues into the next two panels but mostly as a storytelling thing rather than a big presence like in panel three. Its presence gets bigger again in panel six as it gets bigger and cracks the dream head. I’m not sure about those shovel motion lines though.

It’s the color and line work that I like in panels three through six. The line work is mostly lines following the planes of the muscle forms but they vibrate well with the blue, red, and green all making my eyes go kablooey. It works. The story got interesting for me here.

It was these panels that triggered the feelings of nostalgia for me. The rest of the story was okay and an learned a lot doing it but in the end it was the weird panels that were my way forward. That’s not to say I didn’t try my hand at other realistic type techniques. I did continue with that after this but they all ended up nowhere. I’m just not a realistic artist.

Oddly enough despite realism not having a big place in the fine art world it’s generally the most encouraged form of art around. I think its that people respond best to it. If you can paint a chair that really looks like a chair people say, “Cool, that really looks like a chair.” But if you paint an odd creature from the edge of imagination they often have no idea how to react. So the real gets encouraged by default and artists try to paint that way even if it doesn’t suit them. And it didn’t suit me despite my trying.

What suited me was this dream sequence. I had drawn many dream like things before but I think this one showing up in an otherwise realistic endeavor made me realize I should abandon the real and enter the dream. It suits me. Now I’m nostalgic for that epiphany.

It’s a lot of work to look through photos. Especially if I’m looking through photos for ones I want to work with. To make into something. To create something out of. In these digital days it’s actually easier to look through photos than in the non-digital days but digital also means it’s a lot easier to take photo so therefore I have a lot more of them to look through.

I took my first photo class back in the Spring of 1985. I learned how a camera works and how to print black and white photos in the darkroom. Though I enjoyed working in the darkroom I only had access to one for that semester and the two after it. Since then I haven’t done a lick of darkroom work. I still took photos back in the film days but brought them to one of the many photo processing places that were around then. I would drop the film off and in a couple of days it would come back developed with four by six inch prints of each photo. Usually I would get double prints because it was only a dollar or so more.

What I took pictures of in those days were mostly friends and family at parties and gatherings. I kept the good photos in photo albums. Maybe half to two thirds of the pictures in any given roll of film were good enough to put in the album. I couldn’t bring myself to throw away the bad photos because often there was some piece of it that I liked. A face here, a figure there, maybe a part of the background, I could find something to like in most of the bad pictures. So I threw them into a box.

It wasn’t until sometime in the mid 1990’s when I saw some photos that David Hockney was doing, he was cutting them up and pasting them down, that it occurred to me that I could use just the good parts of the bad photos. I began cutting up my bad photos and rearranging them into something new. In order to do this I had to look through all the photos.

I had a box full of a few hundred four by six photos. It was a chore to look through them. Eventually I arranged them into a few topics, single person, a few people, a group of people, landscape, buildings, objects, and whatever else I could think of. That made it easier but it was still a chore. Especially since they weren’t good photos to begin with. But whenever I needed some pieces for a new work I trudged through them.

These days it’s a lot easier to look through photos on a screen. When I first went digital back in the late 1990s it was much harder. There weren’t many photo organizing apps and I had to open each photo in Photoshop to look at it. After a few years I found an app called Photogrid that I used all the time. It was made just for looking at photos. I’d point it to a folder of images and it would display them in a grid. Being that it was somewhere around the early 2000s the app was slow. I had to make 72dpi versions of all my hi-res photos in order to speed up their viewing.

These days there is all sorts of photo management software. Apple, Adobe, Microsoft, and others make apps to help organize, view, and edit photos. I don’t use any of those. I organize my photos on the file and folder level. I decided, back before any of these programs came out, that I didn’t want to depend on one only to have the company change or discontinue it. I was spending a lot of time scanning and organizing my photos and that time would be wasted if I had to start over again because of some app I was using.

I mostly shoot street photos these days. I still take photos of my friends and family but there are not as many get togethers as there used to be. That and when I shoot street photos I use burst mode and shoot for a five or six hours on a Saturday. I can easily end up with four thousand images shooting that way (that would have been an impossibility with film and photo paper) and end up with a ton of photos to look through.

When I get home from taking street photos I make a new folder with the date, place, and any event that might have been happening. Usually it’s Bryant Park and street photos but sometimes it’s other parts of the city. It’s easy enough to look through the photos in the folder nowadays. I don’t even need an app. I just open the folder, hit command four, and the folder switches to “Cover flow” view and gives me a large preview of the photos. The I hit the up or down keys on the keyboard to scroll through the images. I can even look at them on my iPad these days. I have an app called “File Browser” that lets me use my iPad to look at files on my computer. It preview the photos on a grid and I can enlarge any one of them I want to see.

So now the physical aspect off looking through photos is much easier but the mental aspect is harder. I used to have a few hundred photos in a box. Now I have four thousand photos in a folder. And that folder is just for one day’s shooting. I usually choose just one day’s shooting at a time to look through. Today I picked the folder from September 10, 2016. It took me hours to look through and find something I wanted to work with. I scrolled through each photo, one by one, and as something caught my eye I’d look at the photos surrounding it to pick the best one. Then I’d mark it with a label and move one. Over and over until 4400 photos were looked at. Now I need a break.